Creative Log
Stage 1
In the beginning of this project we began by looking at different practitioners; Brecht, Berkoff, Artaud. We at what their style was, how they used set and lighting, what influenced them and what themes they portrayed.
In the beginning of this project we began by looking at different practitioners; Brecht, Berkoff, Artaud. We at what their style was, how they used set and lighting, what influenced them and what themes they portrayed.
We then
began by looking at the different scripts we could choose and we began by
ruling out which of the ones we didn’t like. During this time we would read
little extracts of these texts to get an idea of the ones we liked.
After fully
ruling out the ones we all didn’t like we began to discuss which practitioner
could go with which text. After discussing this we choose the idea we liked
best and split into our groups.
My group
choose “A Curious Incident of a Dog in the Night Time”


The group was
comprised of me,
Stage 2
We choose the practitioner of Artaud as we all had a common
interest in his style; the theatre of fear. We also felt the first original 20
pages could easily be changed to interpret Artaud’s themes.
We went
through a few different drafts before we felt we had changed enough. From here
I will refer to two different drafts; Draft 1 and Draft 2.
The first
serious draft we had turned into a complete failure. All we had done was add a
small introductory scene, cut lines and added a few effects by using sound and
lighting.
The second
draft was the one we finally went with. This first began after one of our
rehearsals completely failed.
In the first
creations stages of the second draft we completely scrapped all previous ideas
and we began from scratch. The premise of the ideas came from the idea that we
would run through different scenes from the script but change a few different
factors, we would then re-run these scenes however we would further develop the
changes.
My
contribution comes in the form that I came up with the idea of using the nursery Rhyme "How Much is that Doggy" during the performance
The original
story follows the character of Christopher as he is framed for murdering his
neighbour’s dog. Christopher then begins his investigation to clear his name
and find out who actually killed the dog.
To make this
into the style of Artaud we began to change a few factors of the original
story. We first changed the idea that I was Christopher that actually killed
the dog. However it wasn’t the dog it was actually Mr Shears. Our script then
follows Christopher as he meets the police officer, the convict number 40 and
his farther. Then on our re-run we would further develop this factor to it
wasn’t a dog he killed it was himself that he killed.
When making
this script we hadn’t had the need to create any new characters. However we had
to completely change the concepts of some characters. The Character of
Christopher now became insane, this was to reflect one of Artaud's themes. Siobhan in the original story had a strange role;
she is Christopher’s teacher but acts like a narrator to the story. We changed
this so she was just the narrator to the story. Mrs Shears became Mr Shears for
convenience for costume. The police officer became an abusive cop. Number 40
was an unnamed character in the original script; however we felt we could do
something sinister to him, so we made him become a paedophile. Ed also became
an abusive Parent and finally Reverent Peters stayed the same. We added two
minor parts to ghost and echo Christopher, these were voice 1 and 2, these
would symbolise his depression weighing him down and controlling him.
Artaud’s use
of costume was very minimalist; he usually had his actors in all black or in
block colours. We decided for all of our costumes it would be black trousers
and a white T-shirt for all characters, this would allow the lighting to affect
the colour of our clothing.
Makeup was
another thing Artaud used very sparingly, he would use it to accentuate facial
features and add darker eyes. For our make-up we did exactly that, white face
with dark rings around the eyes.
One of
Artaud’s main features is making the audience feel uncomfortable, so we decided
that the best layout for our staging would incorporate the use of Promenade as
to make the audience move around, this would also make it much easier to interact
with them.
For the
actual set we divide the room up into 9 equal sections. In section 1 there
would be a Desk angled to face inwards to the centre of the room. Section 2, 3,
4 and 6 were left empty, section 5 had a cage in the centre, above it there was
a plush dog suspended with rope. In the cage there was a bone, and tied to the
cage was leashes for the audience to be tied to. In section 7 there was a frame
where we tied piping to create a jail-cell-like setting. Section 8 had a coffin
in which we filled with dirt. Finally I section 9 we had another desk facing
inwards.
Artaud’s
lighting mainly featured colours like red and green to show death and white
blinding lights to disorientate the audience, so we used red lighting to give
the set a more sinister feel.
Our script
features a lot of use of recordings to add different effects like a dog
whimpering. We also used recordings to have dialogue with characters that were
otherwise unavailable to speak at that time
Finally we
had a dress rehearsal, for this we gathered a small audience of 4 students and
preformed it to them to get an idea of the overall pacing and to get a general
idea of the audience’s reactions.




Comments
Post a Comment